Welfare Centre, said the lottery is wrong to resist printing awards prosecution was dismissed Lottery
Shenzhen newspaper (Reporter Wang Na) yesterdayb causing public concernb there is widespread controversy in the legal profession is also the "Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center sued the" caseb 3 days after the trialb there will be a stage results Court of First Instance found that this is a wrong voteb should not Duijiang Welfare Center7 Shenzhen Lottery Chu play "Scratch" scrapings 51b000 yuan awardb to be invalidated Welfare Center refused Duijiangb Mr7 Zhu Welfare Centreb the Shenzhen courtb claims 70b000 yuan7 Yesterday's Court of Shenzhen Welfare Centre Chu tickets section 4 yuan compensation and losses 6b500 yuanb dismissed the other claims7 Cases Focus4 1 Welfare Centreb should it be Duijiang? Luohu court of first instance that this lottery is a printing gaps existb so there is no Welfare Center for the missing lottery payment obligations7 Court held that the facts of the case sufficient to establish the sale of Lottery Welfare Center gaps exist in printb Mr7 Zhu to buy lottery result lottery number in the suspected "12"b "14"b but its essence is "42"b "447" Payment obligations to achieveb should be established on the basis of winningb according to rules of the gameb not winning Lottery Chu7 Thereforeb the Welfare Centreb winning the plaintiff should not be grounds for Duijiang7 Cases Focus4 2 Welfare Centreb how should bear responsibility for tickets right or wrong? Court of First Instance that the Lo Wub printing the missing facts sufficient to establish Welfare Centre constitute breach of contractb breach of contract should bear the responsibility7 Luohu court held that the Welfare Centreb the specific scope of responsibility should be in accordance with the provisions of contract law and the plaintiff lost the actual conditions7 In addition to Mr7 Zhu section 4 yuan ticket spendingb the appraisal feesb transportationb lost incomeb feesb Welfare Centreb should be compensated7 In additionb the Welfare Lottery Centre should compensate the loss of Mr7 Zhu is not winning it? In this regardb the Court considered the purchase of lottery gambling behavior of a certainb will hit the jackpot with uncertainty7 Welfare Lottery Center of breach of contract and the bonus of Mr7 Zhu has not been a causal relationship between consequences and therefore no compensation Welfare Lottery Center is not winning losses7 Plaintiff4 first instance verdict against Finallyb the court of first instanceb the defendant returned to plaintiffb Mr7 Zhu Shenzhen Welfare Centre tickets section 4 yuan6 compensation for loss of 6500 yuan Chu plaintiff6 dismissed the plaintiff's other claims Mr Chu7 Yesterdayb the case made its decisionb the plaintiff and the defendant Welfare Centre on behalf of Mr7 Zhu were not present in court7 And Mr7 Zhu's attorney to convey the views of Mr7 Zhu saidb do not agree with the court's decisionb as to whether to appealb you need to discuss with Mr7 Zhu after the decision7
树脂工艺品批发